Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 6, 2015 21:35:24 GMT
Unfortunately, even though you have blocked me on FB I can still see all your posts. Such is life. Threatened? Why should you feel threatened? I was merely saying how much I enjoyed my hour at Fans Fitness last night. I always enjoy using the boxing pads, especially when I haven't used them for a few weeks......talk about paranoid! Oh, by the way, if you had done MORE than just a little bit of research you would have seen than Darragh Lenihan's loan deal expired on January 3rd (as per the official club announcement back in November regarding extending his deal). Not sure where you get it from either that it is only a 28 day loan at a time. The rules state that youth loans are for a MINIMUM of 28 days eg from the first date that the loan is taken out so in Darragh's case when Gary signed him in October. It is then flexible how long the loan is for as long as it does not go past their 21st birthday or the expiration of their contract with their parent club. You see.......proper research gives you more accurate facts. Missed the session Monday, man flu is very debilitating… I am sure the pads were very satisfactory, you can't beat a good pad session, hard work, but most cathartic!
|
|
|
Post by cbh1 on Jan 6, 2015 22:27:35 GMT
We missed you last night mate. Made sure I did the pads first so had most energy to expend on them. Started the year with a weigh in! I always thought you were supposed to put ON weight over Christmas Wasn't too bad this week but think next week with bad cop back it will be harder.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 6, 2015 22:33:10 GMT
Oh yes, can't wait til next week :-)
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 6, 2015 23:29:18 GMT
Threatened? Why should you feel threatened? Oh, by the way, if you had done MORE than just a little bit of research you would have seen than Darragh Lenihan's loan deal expired on January 3rd (as per the official club announcement back in November regarding extending his deal). Not sure where you get it from either that it is only a 28 day loan at a time. The rules state that youth loans are for a MINIMUM of 28 days eg from the first date that the loan is taken out so in Darragh's case when Gary signed him in October. It is then flexible how long the loan is for as long as it does not go past their 21st birthday or the expiration of their contract with their parent club. You see.......proper research gives you more accurate facts. It just seemed a quite strange thing to say in a new signing thread? Perhaps you were boasting? I told you in the Hartlepool Match thread on Dec.14th the date Lenihans loan expired on ? Lenihan (Jan.3rd), Morris (Dec.21st), Blyth (Jan. ?), Matthews (Dec.27th) and McFadzean (Jan.3rd) loans all end within the next month. How do we know the latest loan deal is not a 28 day loan? Oh, and if in Darraghs case the loan was flexible why did they need to sign a new loan deal? Ps: I got Callum's wrong I heard it's the 17th or something. Did you tell me that?
|
|
|
Post by cbh1 on Jan 6, 2015 23:45:54 GMT
The latest loan must be for more than 28 days. If the current deal expired on Jan 3rd (Saturday) and the deal has been extended to February 7th then that is more than 28 days. Darragh has not gone back to Blackburn in the meantime so it is definitely continuous. As I said, the wording of the loan rules says something about either a minimum of 28 days or at least 28 days (cant be bothered to look it up right now) but it refers to the initial period at the start of the loan. Darragh signed on the day we played away at Carlisle and it was renewed in the days after we played at Wycombe (w/c 17th Nov). Once the initial 28 days are covered the loan can go to any length not exceeding his 21st birthday or the expiry of his contract. I was chatting with Callum in the tunnel at the Tranmere game on Boxing Day and I thought he said his loan was up on the 15th but it might have been the 17th, I cant quite remember for definite. He was unsure what will happen because he reckons he will only be back to fitness in the week or so before that (so probably next week) and by that I took it to mean that he would be back in 'full' training at that point. FWIW I would like to see Callum stay longer but I guess it will depend upon what other plans (ones that I don't know about ) JFH has for his January shopping/budget.
|
|
|
Post by E7#9 on Jan 7, 2015 7:36:19 GMT
This is turning into a very boring thread.
|
|
|
Post by swaddy Dave on Jan 7, 2015 8:21:31 GMT
This is turning into a very boring thread. Agreed. A certain few on here need to think, do most people want to read this before posting such drivel and getting involved in petty arguments. Its getting to the stage where I just can't be bothered to read it .
|
|
|
Post by claymillman on Jan 7, 2015 9:12:49 GMT
This is turning into a very boring thread. Agreed. A certain few on here need to think, do most people want to read this before posting such drivel and getting involved in petty arguments. Its getting to the stage where I just can't be bothered to read it . Agree with you both. One or two on here should look at their postings, and wonder at the trivialities they keep putting out. This site is for comment and various views, but not for petty squabbles and immature sideswipes Let's get back to some sensible postings please.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 7, 2015 9:54:01 GMT
I have to agree. It all got a bit warped last Oct-Nov until Norah cracked the whip. But it has gone downhill in the past week or so.
|
|
|
Post by swaddy Dave on Jan 7, 2015 14:14:17 GMT
I have to agree. It all got a bit warped last Oct-Nov until Norah cracked the whip. But it has gone downhill in the past week or so. That's funny Did you ever consider that you indeed could be one of those few !
|
|
|
Post by observer on Jan 7, 2015 19:26:01 GMT
Isn't there an ignore function that CBH and peacock can use on each others posts?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 7, 2015 20:09:39 GMT
Isn't there an ignore function that CBH and peacock can use on each others posts? There is, but it doesn't work. There is a bug in their software. Trust me, I've tried it.
|
|