Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 31, 2019 17:49:18 GMT
|
|
|
Post by NobodyGood on May 31, 2019 18:01:47 GMT
Oh hand balls will be fun then.
Define unnaturally bigger....!
|
|
|
Post by otep on May 31, 2019 19:02:23 GMT
Excellent news about this one (below). It is so annoying when a player makes his way to the furthest part of the field knowing he is about to be substituted and then walks slowly to the dugout area, shaking as many hands as possible en route.
SUBSTITUTIONS A player who is being substituted must leave the field by the nearest point on the touchline/goal line (unless the referee indicates the player can leave quickly/immediately at the halfway line or a different point because of safety or injury).
|
|
|
Post by otep on May 31, 2019 19:19:56 GMT
Here's a few new rules I would like introduced,
1) Teams conceding a goal can kick off whenever they like - even if the opposing side are not back in their own half. That would stop tedious extended goal celebrations in an instant !
2) Players that have dived in the penalty area - and it has been proven beyond reasonable doubt - will be subject to a 10 game ban and their club deducted one point for each such incident.
3) All cup ties prior to the quarter final stage will see the lowest league side of the two play that fixture at home regardless of which team was drawn first. Cup ties featuring clubs from the same league will see the club drawn first get home advantage.
|
|
|
Post by broomo on May 31, 2019 19:44:58 GMT
Here's a few new rules I would like introduced, 1) Teams conceding a goal can kick off whenever they like - even if the opposing side are not back in their own half. That would stop tedious extended goal celebrations in an instant ! 2) Players that have dived in the penalty area - and it has been proven beyond reasonable doubt - will be subject to a 10 game ban and their club deducted one point for each such incident. 3) All cup ties prior to the quarter final stage will see the lowest league side of the two play that fixture at home regardless of which team was drawn first. Cup ties featuring clubs from the same league will see the club drawn first get home advantage. I like number 1. Number two - i think 10 games is too long, especially when you consider some of the absolute thuggish things that happen only getting 2 or 3 game bans. I'd much prefer "sin bins" where anyone caught diving gets immediately sent off for 15 or 20 minutes. If the dive is committed with less than 15 minutes to go then the sin bin is carried over. I quite like number 3 as well but I think some clubs would prefer to be drawn away from home as it makes them more money. I also see issues (examplei) if it was a small championship club who were in the bottom 3 playing against a giant club who were sitting top of league one. I'd like to see all cynical (or professional ?!?!) fouls result in either a red card or an immediate 15 minute sin bin. No matter where they take place on the pitch. A "good" foul for the team is creeping into the game a lot more than it should. As you can probably see, I'd be massively in favour of the sin bin, probably in place of the yellow card. I see no sense in a player getting suspended for the "next" game giving a potential advantage to future opponents and none at all to the team he's committed the act of cheating against. I'd still have the totting up process in place as well though, so persistent offenders would get "extra" games off. Five 15 minute sin bins = 2 game suspension.
|
|
|
Post by swaddy Dave on Jun 1, 2019 8:23:02 GMT
Wasn't there a rule introduced a few seasons back that players could not surround the Ref, and only the captain was allowed to challenge his/her decision? I thought there Was but it is still happening. ☹
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 1, 2019 8:59:46 GMT
Here's a few new rules I would like introduced, 1) Teams conceding a goal can kick off whenever they like - even if the opposing side are not back in their own half. That would stop tedious extended goal celebrations in an instant ! 2) Players that have dived in the penalty area - and it has been proven beyond reasonable doubt - will be subject to a 10 game ban and their club deducted one point for each such incident. 3) All cup ties prior to the quarter final stage will see the lowest league side of the two play that fixture at home regardless of which team was drawn first. Cup ties featuring clubs from the same league will see the club drawn first get home advantage. Apparently in respect of number 1, if all opposition players leave the field of play, you can kick off straightaway. Hence the goalkeeper usually foes not join in the mass ridiculous celebrations.
|
|
|
Post by otep on Jun 1, 2019 9:21:06 GMT
I have weighed up your alternative Broomo and I am of the mind that in the mind of a footballer being absent for 15-20 minutes of a game might be considered a risk worth taking. Crucially, most decisions that someone definitely did dive would be retrospective long after the game has ended. A penalty and perhaps a game won through a dive will be recorded in history and on the points tally in the league table. I am beginning to re-think my 1 point deduction plan on this now! Theoretically one could get a 1 point deduction for winning a game 1-0 by cheating and thus still be 2 points in credit.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 1, 2019 9:39:17 GMT
Here's a few new rules I would like introduced, 1) Teams conceding a goal can kick off whenever they like - even if the opposing side are not back in their own half. That would stop tedious extended goal celebrations in an instant ! 2) Players that have dived in the penalty area - and it has been proven beyond reasonable doubt - will be subject to a 10 game ban and their club deducted one point for each such incident. 3) All cup ties prior to the quarter final stage will see the lowest league side of the two play that fixture at home regardless of which team was drawn first. Cup ties featuring clubs from the same league will see the club drawn first get home advantage. I like number 1. Number two - i think 10 games is too long, especially when you consider some of the absolute thuggish things that happen only getting 2 or 3 game bans. I'd much prefer "sin bins" where anyone caught diving gets immediately sent off for 15 or 20 minutes. If the dive is committed with less than 15 minutes to go then the sin bin is carried over. I quite like number 3 as well but I think some clubs would prefer to be drawn away from home as it makes them more money. I also see issues (examplei) if it was a small championship club who were in the bottom 3 playing against a giant club who were sitting top of league one. I'd like to see all cynical (or professional ?!?!) fouls result in either a red card or an immediate 15 minute sin bin. No matter where they take place on the pitch. A "good" foul for the team is creeping into the game a lot more than it should. As you can probably see, I'd be massively in favour of the sin bin, probably in place of the yellow card. I see no sense in a player getting suspended for the "next" game giving a potential advantage to future opponents and none at all to the team he's committed the act of cheating against. I'd still have the totting up process in place as well though, so persistent offenders would get "extra" games off. Five 15 minute sin bins = 2 game suspension. They are trialling sin bins in step 3 or below (cant remember) next season. Gets complicated around goal keepers...
|
|
|
Post by claymillman on Jun 2, 2019 10:06:26 GMT
I can see when strikers are not allowed in a wall, they will be deployed one inside each goal post.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 2, 2019 12:55:36 GMT
I too like the idea of the sin bin. Would the 15 minutes be “game time” or an actual 15 mins? Bit of time wasting until your star cheater / striker gets back on again
Also make each half 40 minutes and have clock stopped and started during breaks in play.
Any fans singing “Albion” 4 times and then stopping to be shot.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 3, 2019 18:01:32 GMT
Number 3. Lowest place team to have the choice of home or away.
|
|
|
Post by claymillman on Jun 3, 2019 18:21:32 GMT
I agree and mentioned before that I think timekeeping should be under the control of the fourth official. The clock running only when the ball is in play to stop time wasting. The playing time would have to be decreased to perhaps 35 minutes to allow for the stoppages. In addition the time played should be on display wherever possible to the teams and supporters, so that the final whistle is no longer a mystery to all bar the referee. Where do 6 minutes come from 5 added minutes? we all see this sort of thing sometimes even changing the result,
|
|
|
Post by trevor1946 on Jun 4, 2019 8:44:29 GMT
Sure a timekeeper could mean every game would last ninety minutes,And v-a-r technology on game changing incidents would make human error a thing of the past Not so , there would always be incidents that would be debatable ,free kicks and corners ,throw ins. e-t-c but game changes like penalties and sending players off could be a thing of the past
|
|
|
Post by bennyboy on Jun 4, 2019 12:17:30 GMT
You're allowed an extra tattoo per season, one hairstyle until the halfway stage of the season and strictly no pink boots.
|
|
|
Post by otep on Jun 4, 2019 18:15:32 GMT
Your average 90 minute football match has the ball in play for 60 minutes at best and 48 minutes at worst. One pays to watch 90 minutes of football, not somewhere between 48 and 60. It is quite a unique form of entertainment whereby one is guaranteed not to get what one paid for, one knows it upfront and one willing pays it too !
|
|
|
Post by otep on Jul 4, 2019 19:31:17 GMT
I was thinking last night that having 4 linos would help the game and decision making.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 4, 2019 21:24:54 GMT
I was thinking last night that having 4 linos would help the game and decision making. I can see that, it works in ice hockey and in rugby the linos do the full length of the pitch. Problem is, most referees see linos as having only one function and that is offside. How often do you see the ref telling the lino which way to give a throw in?
|
|
|
Post by broomo on Jul 5, 2019 9:39:54 GMT
I was thinking last night that having 4 linos would help the game and decision making. I can see that, it works in ice hockey and in rugby the linos do the full length of the pitch. Problem is, most referees see linos as having only one function and that is offside. How often do you see the ref telling the lino which way to give a throw in? I was a "lino" for a season as a young kid, while I decided whether to keep playing after 3 broken ankles in a year, don't know if i ever mentioned that!! which is unusual for me ;-) Most refs before the game would say "all i want you to do is focus on offisde and which way the ball went out, I'll decide free kicks and if you give an offside that I disagree with, I'll ignore it" 10 minutes into the game, once they'd seen I knew what I was doing, it all changed and they trust you with everything. If I was part of the referee's "assistants" and I gave a decision which he then over ruled, we'd be having words. I'm 5-10 yards away, you're 30 yards away. I think the quality of lino has improved a million percent, they get so many things right these days it's fantastic. I really like Otep's idea and can't believe it's not something that's already been brought in, especially once they'd trialled "behind the goal" assistants and seen how well that worked.
|
|